On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 08:02:48PM +, Brother Bill via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I feel like I am going into the hornet's nest with this discussion.
You are. ;-)
> I have created a struct with some members, and want to have a
> parameterless constructor that sets the member values at run
On Monday, 4 August 2025 at 20:02:48 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
I feel like I am going into the hornet's nest with this
discussion.
I have created a struct with some members, and want to have a
parameterless constructor that sets the member values at run
time.
I have seen things like @disable
On Monday, 4 August 2025 at 20:02:48 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
I feel like I am going into the hornet's nest with this
discussion.
I have created a struct with some members, and want to have a
parameterless constructor that sets the member values at run
time.
I know of no sane way to do that
I feel like I am going into the hornet's nest with this
discussion.
I have created a struct with some members, and want to have a
parameterless constructor that sets the member values at run time.
I have seen things like @disable this(); and static opCall(),
but don't quite understand them.
On Monday, 4 August 2025 at 15:13:19 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
To complicate matters, the spec sometimes uses 'object' just to
mean an instance of any type:
If a pointer contains a null value, it is not pointing to a
valid object.
https://dlang.org/spec/type.html#pointers
Note: git blame h
On Monday, 4 August 2025 at 02:47:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The spec does use the term "aggregate type" to refer to
classes, structs, interfaces, and unions, since they're all
aggregates of values. However, from what I've seen, the term
isn't used very often outside of the spec, and I don
