Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Daniel White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> That would be a bad idea. Then how would you do manual memory
> >> management in the few cases that absolutely require it?
> >
> > Two ways. Ei
> That would be a bad idea. Then how would you do manual memory
> management in the few cases that absolutely require it?
Two ways. Either:
a: being able to lock the variable so that the garbage collector
can't touch it until you unlock it.
b: Using a slightly different version of malloc (say '
Thanks for that reply. I wonder if extending automatic garbage
collection for malloced memory would be a good idea...
> Only stuff like dynamic
> arrays, AAs and new'ed stuff gets cleaned up by the GC.
For the above types of allocating memory, is there a way to 'lock' a
variable and say to D, "d
