On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 12:02:50 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
is there any way for an object to make it self no longer
usable? eg
class someclass {
string somevalue;
bool someflag;
int somelength;
this (value,length,flag) {
somevalue = value;
Is there a way to take an interface and implement it generically?
e.g., All functions are implemented either as throw and/or return
defaults and properties are implemented as getter/setters.
This is for mocking up so I a simple way to create a class based
off only the interface.
Essentially
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 17:50:35 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
when I build dustmite using dmd or gdc with no options or -O3,
it is 18M but in the dmd directory, dustmite is only 650k. I
assume I'm statically linking the whole library while in the
small one is using some dynamic link library? Or is
when I build dustmite using dmd or gdc with no options or -O3, it
is 18M but in the dmd directory, dustmite is only 650k. I assume
I'm statically linking the whole library while in the small one
is using some dynamic link library? Or is all that debug
information or what?
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 09:56:17 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 7 July 2014 at 02:57:09 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
So, I took all the code surrounding the error message(which
was a lot of code) and stuck it into one .d file.
No errors! Works as expected.
So, WTF?!?!
I guess now I have to a
So, I took all the code surrounding the error message(which was a
lot of code) and stuck it into one .d file.
No errors! Works as expected.
So, WTF?!?!
I guess now I have to attempt to split the code across modules to
see WTF is going on? Maybe this is a modules issue. I know some
of the cod
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 21:15:02 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 20:25:28 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:31:28 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:28:48 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:42:36 UTC, bearophile wrote
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 20:25:28 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:31:28 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:28:48 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:42:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frustrated:
I'm not using 2.066 though...
I will rev
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:31:28 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 16:28:48 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:42:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frustrated:
I'm not using 2.066 though...
I will revert back to the dmd version I was using when it
worked...
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:42:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frustrated:
Since there is no recursion going on there, it shouldn't be a
problem.
Yes, sorry.
In dmd 2.066 this too could work:
alias Array(T) = std.container.Array!T;
Bye,
bearophile
That just gives more errors.
I'm not using
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:37:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:07:00 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
After upgrading to latest dmd, I get the follow error on the
code
template Array(T) { alias Array = std.container.Array!T; }
Error: Array!(iDataBlock).Array recursive alias dec
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 15:10:14 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Frustrated:
After upgrading to latest dmd, I get the follow error on the
code
template Array(T) { alias Array = std.container.Array!T; }
Try to use a different name inside the template, like "Vector".
Bye,
bearophile
Huh?
The tem
After upgrading to latest dmd, I get the follow error on the code
template Array(T) { alias Array = std.container.Array!T; }
Error: Array!(iDataBlock).Array recursive alias declaration
I don't see anything recursive about it... and the code worked
before. Any ideas?
On Sunday, 20 April 2014 at 16:56:59 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
My understanding is not perfect. There may be compiler and CPU
optimizations that I am not aware of.
On 04/20/2014 08:03 AM, Frustrated wrote:
> is the only argument really about performance when creating
> structs vs creating classe
I know the difference between a struct and a class but I remember
seeing somewhere that structs are much faster than classes in D
for some strange reason.
I'm not worried too much about class allocation performance
because I will try and use classes when they will not be created
frequently an
15 matches
Mail list logo
