On Sunday, 9 June 2013 at 13:37:45 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hello guys!
It seems that it is bug. And critical for me.
http://dpaste.1azy.net/b93f5776
Regards.
I don't know whether it's a bug, but I managed to reduce the error
to the following code (removing __traits code):
import std.stdio;
On Saturday, 25 May 2013 at 01:03:53 UTC, Namal wrote:
255 - 129 is less than 128 so the result is T.max, which is
255, which is not equal to 0.
I dont understand this at all 255 - 129 should be 126 in ubyte
or not?
I checked, and operation between two ubyte is an int. When you
cast that
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 02:25:02 UTC, Heinz wrote:
I have this "main loop" wich is named here as my consumer
function. I didn't want this main loop to be cycling all the
time if there was nothing to do. So i needed an event object
(condition/mutex) that locked the loop until any of t
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 17:59:55 UTC, Heinz wrote:
Guys, this is a precise example of what i'm trying to do.
You'll notice that there're 2 ways of waking up the consumer:
/
Condition cond; // Previously instantiated.
bool lo
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 03:34:52 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
A)
The behavior of __ctor (whether or not documented) seems broken
/ unreliable:
struct A{this(T)(T x){}}
void fun(T){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1);
}
void main(){
auto a=A.__ctor!(int)(1); //ok
fun!int(); //Error: type A is not
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 21:55:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:04:22 -0400, Juan Manuel Cabo
wrote:
I seem to recall (though I might be wrong) that win32 events
can be signalled before the thread calls WaitForSingleObject
(or WaitForMultipleObjects), and if it
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 20:44:37 UTC, Heinz wrote:
Ok, here's a summary in case someone else is in the same need:
1) Want to know what "mutex/condition" are, how do they work
and when to use them? Here's a good resource:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4742236
2) If you come to the question "Wh
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 01:05:39 UTC, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
Then, tested on Windows XP SP3 32 bits, dmd 2.062,
and it DIDN'T CRASH. The output is:
Mm, sorry!!, it did crash but I had dr watson disabled in that VM.
Confirmed adding a writeln("finished") after the foreac
Tested on Linux - Kubuntu 12.04 64bits
dmd 2.058 -m32
dmd 2.058 64 bits
dmd 2.062 -m32
dmd 2.062
and the output is this for all of the above:
Loop: 0
Loop: 1
Caught
Loop: 2
Loop: 3
Caught
Loop: 4
Loop: 5
Caught
Then, tested on Windows X
I found this problem with a program that reads a large xml file
(25+ lines), then stores the lines in a string[], does a
comparison with another array and finally clears the original
array.
On the second or third file I always get an OutOfMemoryError,
when the Task Manager shows about 1.3GB
Why isn't the memory deallocating?
The memory might be free, but still not released to the OS.
Especially in windows, when you free memory it still isn't freed
from
your process.
But you can reuse it in your program if the GC has collected it.
The correct test would be to copy and paste the
11 matches
Mail list logo
