D is being used productively by some companies, so I guess we can call it
production-ready. This doesn't meant there are not rough corners. The
language is being actively developed, and I see that some work is being
done on those rough corners. However, keep in mind that:
1) Maybe what you
Try http://dlang.org/blog/
But, indeed, I would expect blog.dlang.org to work...
Cheers,
LMB
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Christian Köstlin <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I just wanted to have a look at the new blog post about ldc, and entered
> blog.dlang.org without
I have been using Textadept ( http://foicica.com/textadept/ ) with
Textadept-d ( https://github.com/Hackerpilot/textadept-d ). I use mostly on
Linux for development, but I've recently spent two or three days on Windows
and things worked well enough for me.
(Coming for someone who has used Emacs
dependency.
LMB
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 12:35:38 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> You probably already though of it, but: can't you create a unit
You probably already though of it, but: can't you create a unittest that
calls your code as many times as desired, passing different input each time?
LMB
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I currently run
Hello,
I have a module which is completelly @nogc, and as such I'd like to just say
@nogc:
at the top of the file and be happy.
However, my unit tests for this same module do some GC allocation, so the
module fails to compile.
Is there a way to disable @nogc for the unit tests only? Would
Thanks, this was helpful!
LMB
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:22 PM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 15:26:02 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hello,
I have a module which is completelly
Justin's answers seems correct to me, and I don't know anything about your
specific use case, but I cannot resist to add:
Think twice before doing this kind of things. I know that sometimes this is
necessary or handy, but one of the great things about D is that it provides
so many higher-level
Can't you call it directly?
extern(C)
{
int add (int a, int b)';
}
// ...
auto ret = add(123, 456);
LMB
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:55 PM, seany via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Can you post the signatures of some of the C functions you're trying to
Hi,
Some time ago I wrote this Tetris-like game:
https://bitbucket.org/lmb/anytris (also on GitHub:
https://github.com/lmbarros/Anytris)
Nothing fancy. I am sure there are better examples out there. And maybe
this is not the best code to show to students ;-)
Also, license is ZLib -- I assume it
Hi!
I made similar questions here a month ago, but also couldn't get definitive
answers. I just sent a message about this to the main D forum. Let's see if
we have better luck there :-)
Cheers,
LMB
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Lemonfiend le...@fie.nd wrote:
I think this is what you are
: mylib.util.Foo is used as a type
Fishy, isn't it? Maybe I should report this as a bug?
Cheers,
LMB
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/17/13, Leandro Motta Barros l...@stackedboxes.org wrote:
Is there any documentation describing the expected
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 17/12/13 01:51, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
I have some code using the old all.d idiom, which I am changing to use
the new
package.d feature.
Related question -- it seems like rdmd doesn't
Hello,
I have some code using the old all.d idiom, which I am changing to use
the new package.d feature.
Originally, I had something like this:
// mylib/util.d:
module mylib.util;
class Foo { }
// mylib/all.d:
module mylib.all;
public import mylib.util;
// main.d:
import mylib.all;
void
Hello,
I my FewDee game prototyping library (https://bitbucket.org/lmb/fewdee) I
ignored most of the usual reccomendations like be careful with the GC,
it's slow and associative arrays are buggy in D, so avoid them. I just
used whatever I found convenient to have my stuff running with minimal
, Leandro Motta Barros said:
Hello,
I my FewDee game prototyping library (https://bitbucket.org/lmb/fewdee)
I ignored most of the usual reccomendations like be careful with the GC,
it's slow and associative arrays are buggy in D, so avoid them. I just
used whatever I found convenient to have
Hello!
Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
struct MyCollection { ... }
MyCollection mc;
auto p = 123 in mc;
if (p) { ... }
Thanks!
LMB
Thanks!
LMB
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 19:57:42 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
struct MyCollection { ... }
MyCollection mc;
auto
For Win32/OPTLINK, I passed the following flag to dmd in a lil' project of mine:
-L/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS:4.0
Worked for me.
LMB
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rikki Cattermole
alphaglosi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 08:16:39 UTC, MGW wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 July
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-07-13 20:53, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Hey, thanks! This makes sense :-)
Am I now wondering... how safe, portable and future proof would this
be? If some future version of D implements a garbage collector capable
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 13 July 2013 at 18:30:24 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
So, is there some way to store a reference to a D class instance in that
'user_data' field?
Should be ok to cast the reference itself to that type - don't take the
address of it, since
Good. Thanks again!
LMB
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 13 July 2013 at 18:54:18 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
If some future version of D implements a garbage collector capable of
moving objects around the heap, I could get
Also note that if the pointer in C land is the only reference to the
class, the garbage collector will destroy the instance when it gets
around to it.
Yup, I am aware of this. I mentioned that I can guarantee that my
object will outlive the C struct...
There's a function GC.addRoot[1] in
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:45 PM, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:07:56AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 20:51:52 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 06:29:21PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
Seems to me like dtors
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Pankrath tob...@pankrath.net wrote:
On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 02:00:46 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to include the version control revision tag in a program. In
the C/C++ world I'd make my build system call the compiler like
Hello,
I'd like to include the version control revision tag in a program. In
the C/C++ world I'd make my build system call the compiler like this:
g++ -DMY_REVISION_HERE .
so that the revision is available as a preprocessor symbol.
Is there an easy way to achieve the same in D? I can
Hi,
In C, NULL is a #define, and #defines are typically all-caps. In D,
null is real keyword recognized by the compiler, and those are
typically lowercase. I am just guessing here, but I'd say the choice
for 'null' instead of 'NULL' is just to be coherent with this.
Personally, I kinda like
Another option is to use module constructors, as shown below. (But
somehow this all looks a bit fishy for me...)
LMB
import std.stdio;
string a = a;
string b;
static this()
{
b = a;
}
void main()
{
writeln(b);
}
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM, d_follower
28 matches
Mail list logo
