D is being used productively by some companies, so I guess we can call it
production-ready. This doesn't meant there are not rough corners. The
language is being actively developed, and I see that some work is being
done on those rough corners. However, keep in mind that:
1) Maybe what you perceiv
Try http://dlang.org/blog/
But, indeed, I would expect blog.dlang.org to work...
Cheers,
LMB
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Christian Köstlin <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I just wanted to have a look at the new blog post about ldc, and entered
> blog.dlang.org without thinki
I have been using Textadept ( http://foicica.com/textadept/ ) with
Textadept-d ( https://github.com/Hackerpilot/textadept-d ). I use mostly on
Linux for development, but I've recently spent two or three days on Windows
and things worked well enough for me.
(Coming for someone who has used Emacs fo
additional dependency.
LMB
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 12:35:38 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> You probably already though of it, but: can't yo
You probably already though of it, but: can't you create a unittest that
calls your code as many times as desired, passing different input each time?
LMB
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I currently run dmd'
Thanks, this was helpful!
LMB
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:22 PM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 15:26:02 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
Hello,
I have a module which is completelly @nogc, and as such I'd like to just say
@nogc:
at the top of the file and be happy.
However, my unit tests for this same module do some GC allocation, so the
module fails to compile.
Is there a way to disable @nogc for the unit tests only? Would t
Can't you call it directly?
extern(C)
{
int add (int a, int b)';
}
// ...
auto ret = add(123, 456);
LMB
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:55 PM, seany via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Can you post the signatures of some of the C functions you're tryin
Justin's answers seems correct to me, and I don't know anything about your
specific use case, but I cannot resist to add:
Think twice before doing this kind of things. I know that sometimes this is
necessary or handy, but one of the great things about D is that it provides
so many higher-level ab
Hi,
Some time ago I wrote this Tetris-like game:
https://bitbucket.org/lmb/anytris (also on GitHub:
https://github.com/lmbarros/Anytris)
Nothing fancy. I am sure there are better examples out there. And maybe
this is not the best code to show to students ;-)
Also, license is ZLib -- I assume it
Hi!
I made similar questions here a month ago, but also couldn't get definitive
answers. I just sent a message about this to the main D forum. Let's see if
we have better luck there :-)
Cheers,
LMB
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Lemonfiend wrote:
> I think this is what you are looking for
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 17/12/13 01:51, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> I have some code using the old "all.d" idiom, which I am changing to use
>> the new
>> "package.d&
undefined identifier 'util'
main.d(6): Error: mylib.util.Foo is used as a type
Fishy, isn't it? Maybe I should report this as a bug?
Cheers,
LMB
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 12/17/13, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
> > Is there any documenta
.
Thank again,
LMB
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some code using the old "all.d" idiom, which I am changing to use
> the new "package.d" feature.
>
> Originally, I had something like this:
>
> // mylib
Hello,
I have some code using the old "all.d" idiom, which I am changing to use
the new "package.d" feature.
Originally, I had something like this:
// mylib/util.d:
module mylib.util;
class Foo { }
// mylib/all.d:
module mylib.all;
public import mylib.util;
// main.d:
import mylib.all;
void ma
I am terribly sorry, this was a completely lazy question.
So far, I couldn't reproduce the problem in a small example. I'll look
deeper into this before posting again about it.
LMB
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
> On 2013-11-30 13:39:15 +0000,
Hello,
I my FewDee game prototyping library (https://bitbucket.org/lmb/fewdee) I
ignored most of the usual reccomendations like "be careful with the GC,
it's slow" and "associative arrays are buggy in D, so avoid them". I just
used whatever I found convenient to have my stuff running with minimal
Thanks!
LMB
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Namespace wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 2013 at 19:57:42 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
>>
>> struct MyCollection { ... }
Hello!
Is it possible to make an InExpression work with a used-defined type?
struct MyCollection { ... }
MyCollection mc;
auto p = 123 in mc;
if (p) { ... }
Thanks!
LMB
For Win32/OPTLINK, I passed the following flag to dmd in a lil' project of mine:
-L/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS:4.0
Worked for me.
LMB
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 08:16:39 UTC, MGW wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 08:08:19 UTC,
too.)
LMB
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-07-13 20:53, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>>
>> Hey, thanks! This makes sense :-)
>>
>> Am I now wondering... how safe, portable and future proof would this
>> be? If some future version o
> Also note that if the pointer in C land is the only reference to the
> class, the garbage collector will destroy the instance when it gets
> around to it.
Yup, I am aware of this. I mentioned that I can guarantee that my
object will outlive the C struct...
> There's a function GC.addRoot[1] in
Good. Thanks again!
LMB
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 July 2013 at 18:54:18 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>>
>> If some future version of D implements a garbage collector capable of
>> moving objects around the heap, I could
wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 July 2013 at 18:30:24 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>>
>> So, is there some way to store a reference to a D class instance in that
>> 'user_data' field?
>
>
> Should be ok to cast the reference itself to that type - don't take
Hello,
TL;DR: Can I somehow store a reference to a D class instance in a
field of a struct from a C library I am using with my D code?
The long story:
I am writing some D code that uses a C library. This C library
provides an event handling mechanism in which events are represented
by (plain C)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:45 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:07:56AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On Sunday, March 31, 2013 20:51:52 H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 06:29:21PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> > [...]
> Seems to me like dtors should be removed
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 02:00:46 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I'd like to include the version control revision tag in a program. In
>> the C/C++ world I'd
Hello,
I'd like to include the version control revision tag in a program. In
the C/C++ world I'd make my build system call the compiler like this:
g++ -D .
so that the revision is available as a preprocessor symbol.
Is there an easy way to achieve the same in D? I can think of
convoluted
Hi,
In C, NULL is a #define, and #defines are typically all-caps. In D,
null is real keyword recognized by the compiler, and those are
typically lowercase. I am just guessing here, but I'd say the choice
for 'null' instead of 'NULL' is just to be coherent with this.
Personally, I kinda like 'null
Another option is to use "module constructors", as shown below. (But
somehow this all looks a bit fishy for me...)
LMB
import std.stdio;
string a = "a";
string b;
static this()
{
b = a;
}
void main()
{
writeln(b);
}
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:03 AM, d_follower wrote:
> On Wednes
30 matches
Mail list logo
