On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 05:46:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, November 5, 2018 7:55:46 PM MST MatheusBN via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 01:55:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
>> And I found a bit strange that in such code, since "x&qu
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 01:05:04 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
In C++, if you skip over `int i = 10;` it's an error, but not
if you skip over `int i;`.
In fact I agree with that rule more than the D one to be honest.
Since It isn't initialized and never used, I think a warning
should be e
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 01:04:46 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
...Even if you don't see any explicit use, it doesn't mean the
compiler doesn't see an implicit one.
Sorry I don't think that I follow that. How a compiler could see
an use when it's not being used/invoked on a program like i
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 01:55:04 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
And I found a bit strange that in such code, since "x" is
never used, why it isn't skipped.
It's skipped right over. The goto jumps out of the scope, and
the line with
int x;
is never run. In fact, if you compile with -w o
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 00:13:52 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
But here it's fine:
void main(){
{
goto Q;
S x;
} // <---
Q:
writeln("a");
}
because goto jumps over both initialization *and* destruction,
i.e. neither would even be performed.
I see b
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 00:14:26 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, November 5, 2018 4:54:59 PM MST MatheusBN via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hi,
I posted this in another thread but without any response.
This code:
void main(){
goto Q;
int x;
Q:
writeln(&q
Hi,
I posted this in another thread but without any response.
This code:
void main(){
goto Q;
int x;
Q:
writeln("a");
}
Gives me this error: "source_file.d(4): Error: goto skips
declaration of variable source.main.x at source_file.d(5)"
Now, if I add a pair of brackets:
