On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 07:30:52 UTC, drug wrote:
What I mean about order of operations is that if you go
a = b*a+c*c + e;
the compiler is free to rewrite that as
float __tmp0 = a*b;
float __tmp1 = c*c;
and then do either of
float __tmp2 = __tmp0+__tmp1;
a = __tmp2 + e;
OR
float __tmp2 =
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 13:17:49 UTC, mipri wrote:
I read your question as "can I have typeclasses in D?"
I guess you could interpret it that way.
I think you knowing Rust at
all might be clouding your vision, actually.
I have hardly ever ran the Rust compiler outside of the onlin
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it
needs a context pointer to parent stack frame.
Only if it is recursive.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 20:48:38 UTC, Chris
Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:17:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
non-static nested functions are effectively delegates as it
needs a context pointer to parent stack frame.
Only if it is recursive.
Or if it refers t
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:19:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 20:48:38 UTC, Chris
Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 15:17:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Gr
wrote:
Only if it is recursive.
Or if it refers to any state of the parent function.
As
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 21:30:41 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, my question inspired a new optimization? :-p
A decent optimizing compiler would detect that the function is
calling itself and save stack space by using register where
possible...
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 23:36:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 23:20:21 UTC, maik klein wrote:
It's actually quite strange that no one has done something
like this in D, it's usually the first thing people do.
Bearophile has created many such examples at Ros
