So this is more a stackoverflow question, but I feel like later
searchers will be more likely to find it if I put it here.
if I have the following C++ code:
class foo
{
static std::list foo_list;
typedef std::list::iterator iterator;
public:
foo()
{
foo_list.push_back(this);
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:56:08 UTC, luminousone wrote:
unless delete is explicitly called, I don't believe the
destructor would ever be called, it would still have a
reference in the static foo_list object that would stop it from
being collected by the gc.
This is exactly why I ask
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 19:44:57 UTC, luminousone wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 19:05:32 UTC, Patrick Jeeves
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 18:56:08 UTC, luminousone
wrote:
unless delete is explicitly called, I don't believe the
destructor would ever be called, it wo
When I tried to test out the following code the compiler
segfaulted:
interface BarBase
{
void do_a_thing();
}
interface Bar(T) : BarBase
{
static if(hasMember!(T, "rotation") && is(typeof(T.rotation) ==
double))
{
@property
double rotation()
