On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 06:55:49 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
More likely is comes from my experience .. otherwise I wouldn't
be surprised ;-)
Now that's a screaming sign:
https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D12AQEymZALzWVDXQ/article-cover_image-shrink_600_2000/0/1629008577928?e=21474
Funny, seems I have old news: Rust adopted D-like module
visibility.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/visibility-and-privacy.html
pub(in path), pub(crate), pub(super), and pub(self)
In addition to public and private, Rust allows users to declare
an item as visible only within a given scope
On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 06:56:08 UTC, ProtectAndHide wrote:
What is 'Object-Oriented Programming'? (1991 revised version)
Bjarne Stroustrup
https://www.stroustrup.com/whatis.pdf
Thirty years passed since. Lessons were learned. Out of three PLs
of the newer generation (Rust, Swift, Go
Data hiding is overrated.
Furthermore, OOP is overrated :-)
https://betterprogramming.pub/object-oriented-programming-the-trillion-dollar-disaster-92a4b666c7c7
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 20:56:00 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Both the module type, and the class type need this capability.
No, they are not.
Look at Go.
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 08:20:21 UTC, ProtectAndHide wrote:
But there is always 'an ugly way' to do it too:
http://www.cs.rit.edu/~ats/books/ooc.pdf
Yep, but it’s not OOP per se, just a form of lowering. First CPP
implementation was a cross-compiled one.
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 at 23:19:35 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
That is, you can do OOP without classes
How so? Every OOP definition includes classes (encapsulation +
inheritance).
On Sunday, 25 December 2022 at 18:30:12 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
This is a working Hello World example without dependency on
Microsoft C Runtime Library, I couldn't find anything by
searching around the forums or search engines, so I'm posting
it here. Please provide improvements if you feel like some
