On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 at 06:51:16 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
This doesn't only happen with null, you will notice that that
function will eventually not add anything if you only add
values. This is because by adding values you might reallocate
the map at some other place in memory and because i
I want to be modify an associative array by reference from
another function. However null associative arrays are pass by
value. How do I generically create an empty associative array?
---
import std.stdio;
void addElement(int[int] data){
data[0] = 0;
}
void nonempty() {
int[in
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 01:25:36 UTC, Heromyth wrote:
On Monday, 4 November 2019 at 00:16:53 UTC, Superstar64 wrote:
Consider the following Java code.
--
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Main{
//basic Rank2 type
static interface Stringer{
String show(Funct
Consider the following Java code.
--
import java.util.function.Function;
public class Main{
//basic Rank2 type
static interface Stringer{
String show(Function type, A that);
}
static class Say implements Stringer {
public String show(Function type, A that){
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 22:14:32 UTC, Superstar64 wrote:
...
Nevermind I just realized I can do this:
---
abstract class MyAbstractClass
{
void myAbstractMethod();
}
void defaultImplentation(T...)
{
}
class MyClass : MyAbstractClass
{
override void myAbstractMethod()
{
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 22:46:14 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
override void mixin (__traits(identifier, Method)) ... ?
Doesn't work:
test.d(8): Error: no identifier for declarator void
test.d(9): Error: found '{' when expecting ')'
test.d(10): Error: found '}' when expecting ';'
I could mak
I'm trying to use mixin templetes to provide generic default
implementations.
Something like this:
---
abstract class MyAbstractClass
{
void myAbstractMethod();
}
mixin template defaultImplentation(alias Method, T...)
{
override void Method()
{
}
}
class MyClass : MyAbstractClas
