On Friday, 28 October 2022 at 09:02:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 28 October 2022 at 02:46:42 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
I'm just right now having an issue with glibc version mismatch
for my server
Just compile with an old enough glibc, 2.14 works for me.
Indeed, if I got it right it seems to
Thank you! I tried this one, but it did not help. All these
warnings survived :
"... Using 'getservbyport' in statically linked applications
requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version
used for linking"
On Thursday, 27 October 2022 at 14:18:01 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On
Dear All,
I am trying to create a static executable to be able to run it on
virtually any linux x86_64 OS. At the end I get a binary,
however, multiple warnings are printed after compilation.
My dub.sdl:
dependency "mir" version="~>3.2.3"
dependency "lubeck" version="~>1.5.1"
lflags
The workaround is to compile without --release mode, but using
the "O3" ldc flag instead does the job - the binary is fast, yet
the try - catch block executes properly.
On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 20:13:37 UTC, Yura wrote:
OK, got the problem solved by adding the following lines in my
OK, got the problem solved by adding the following lines in my
dub.sdl file:
lflags "-lopenblas" "-lgfortran"
dflags "--static"
However, one problem still remains. Apparently, when compiled
with dub --release mode I got segfault in my try - catch block.
Any solution to this?
On Wednesday,
I am now trying to compile the code statically using the dub
manager via the following command line:
dub build --force --build=release --compiler=path_to_ldc2/ldc2
and having these lines in my dub.sdl file:
dependency "mir" version="~>3.2.3"
dependency "lubeck" version="~>1.5.1"
dflags
Yes, did the same and it worked. The amazing thing is that the
system solver turned out to be natively parallel and runs
smoothly!
On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 15:22:02 UTC, mw wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 09:56:09 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Monday, 17 October 2022 at
Thank you, folks, for your hints and suggestions!
Indeed, I re-wrote the code and got it substantially faster and
well paralleled.
Insted of making inner loop parallel, I made parallel both of
them. For that I had to convert 2d index into 1d, and then back
to 2d. Essentially I had to
Dear All,
I am trying to make a simple code run in parallel. The parallel
version works, and gives the same number as serial albeit slower.
First, the parallel features I am using:
import core.thread: Thread;
import std.range;
import std.parallelism:parallel;
import std.parallelism:taskPool;
Dear All, Thank you so much for your replies and hints! I got it
working today. All the libraries are properly linked and the
Equation solver runs smoothly.
The compilers turned out to be problematic though. The "Mir"
library does not work with the Ubuntu 18.04 gdc and ldc
compilers. I have
On Friday, 14 October 2022 at 18:37:00 UTC, Sergey wrote:
On Friday, 14 October 2022 at 17:41:42 UTC, Yura wrote:
Dear All,
I am very new to D, and it has been a while since I coded in
anything than Python. I am using just notepad along with the
gdc compiler.
At the moment I need to solve
Dear All,
I am very new to D, and it has been a while since I coded in
anything than Python. I am using just notepad along with the gdc
compiler.
At the moment I need to solve the system of liner equations:
A00*q0 + A01*q1 + A02*q2 ... = -V0
A10*q0 + A11*q1 + A12*q2 ... = -V1
...
I have
12 matches
Mail list logo
