On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 08:03:26 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
Make first read function templated too like this:
long read()( ubyte* bytes, long len )
In fact, there are workarouns. But why the order of the
declarations has an effect on the compilation result.
Namely, if the templated
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 08:42:34 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 12/20/13, kdmult kdm...@ya.ru wrote:
But why the order of the
declarations has an effect on the compilation result.
I think you should file this as a bug.
Done.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11785
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 09:15:26 UTC, Boyd wrote:
this(int x, int y)
{
X = x;
Y = y;
}
So now my question is, how do you distinguish between member
and local vars in such cases?
this(int x, int y)
{
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}
Hi,
Why compilation depends on order of method declarations?
The following test case does not compile.
However, if we change the order of the 'read' methods in class
InputStream below then compilation will not fail.
Is it a bug?
---
module test;
import std.traits : isBasicType;
import
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 05:07:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 08/05/2013 09:51 PM, kdmult wrote:
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 18:45:49 UTC, kdmult wrote:
class A(P...) {}
class B(R = A!P, P...) {}
P... should be rightmost, so how can I use it in the
preceding parameter?
The default
On Tuesday, 6 August 2013 at 09:53:33 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Do you mean that when P[0] is already an instance of A, then R
should be P[0]. Otherwise, R should be A!P? If so, the
following works:
class A(P...)
{
pragma(msg, \nA: ~ P.stringof);
}
class BImpl(R, P...)
{
pragma(msg,
Hi,
I would like to use a tuple template parameter in the default
value of another template parameter in the same class declaration
as follows.
class A(P...) {}
class B(R = A!P, P...) {}
P... should be rightmost, so how can I use it in the preceding
parameter?
Thanks.
On Monday, 5 August 2013 at 18:45:49 UTC, kdmult wrote:
class A(P...) {}
class B(R = A!P, P...) {}
P... should be rightmost, so how can I use it in the preceding
parameter?
The default parameter value doesn't make sense as it's shown
above.
Actually I want to port C++ code which looks
