Thanks again for all the help. I found what the problem was and it wasn't
obvious (at least to me):
float[uint] arr;
foreach (uint k; arr.keys)
{
...
}
Changing this to:
foreach (uint k, float v; arr)
{
...
}
fixes the leak. I guess the keys array is constructed on the fly?
wade
L
Yes,
this would be a great idea, especially for RT production software.
wade
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:40:13 +0300, BCS wrote:
>
> > Reply to Jarrett,
> >
> >
> >> Hm, actually..
> >> If you *are* using D2, you might be able to r
Thanks,
That's helpful. I'm using D 1.0. I've eliminated all array concats, dups,
etc. but there's still a significant amount of memory being allocated that I
can't seem to detect.
Perhaps, I can recompile an instrumented version of phobos...
wade
Jarrett Billings
Any recommendations would be appreciated.
thanks,
wade
Hi all,
Does anybody have an efficient nth_element implementation (ala the STL) for D
1.0. I was using the version from algortihms.d in DMD 2.012 but that seems to
be non-existent anymore and was quite buggy.
thanks,
wade