Re: "foo.bar !in baz" not allowed?

2011-03-13 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
On 2011-03-13 21:27:27 +0100, spir said: On 03/13/2011 07:58 PM, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: For some reason, it seems like expressions of the form "foo.bar !in baz" aren't allowed. I suspect this is a grammar/parser problem -- the bang is interpreted as a template argument operator, rather than

Re: "foo.bar !in baz" not allowed?

2011-03-13 Thread spir
On 03/13/2011 07:58 PM, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: For some reason, it seems like expressions of the form "foo.bar !in baz" aren't allowed. I suspect this is a grammar/parser problem -- the bang is interpreted as a template argument operator, rather than a negation operator, and there's really no

"foo.bar !in baz" not allowed?

2011-03-13 Thread Magnus Lie Hetland
For some reason, it seems like expressions of the form "foo.bar !in baz" aren't allowed. I suspect this is a grammar/parser problem -- the bang is interpreted as a template argument operator, rather than a negation operator, and there's really no need to make that interpretation when it is imme