08.03.2012 14:00, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
On 08-03-2012 10:42, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
---
void f()
{
static if(x)
asm { mov EBX, 3; }
else
asm { mov EBX, 7; }
asm { mov EAX, EBX; } // I
On 08-03-2012 14:48, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Denis Shelomovskij" wrote in message
news:jj9uv1$8o$1...@digitalmars.com...
1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
---
void f()
{
static if(x)
asm { mov EBX, 3; }
else
"Denis Shelomovskij" wrote in message
news:jj9uv1$8o$1...@digitalmars.com...
> 1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
> inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
> ---
> void f()
> {
> static if(x)
> asm { mov EBX, 3; }
> else
> asm { mov EBX, 7; }
On 08-03-2012 10:42, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
---
void f()
{
static if(x)
asm { mov EBX, 3; }
else
asm { mov EBX, 7; }
asm { mov EAX, EBX; } // Is EBX value defined here?
}
I don't think yo
On 8 March 2012 22:42, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
> 1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
> inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
> ---
> void f()
> {
> static if(x)
> asm { mov EBX, 3; }
> else
> asm { mov EBX, 7; }
>
> asm { mov EAX, EBX; } // Is
1. Is there any guaranties that no code will be added between sequential
inline assembler blocks, e.g.:
---
void f()
{
static if(x)
asm { mov EBX, 3; }
else
asm { mov EBX, 7; }
asm { mov EAX, EBX; } // Is EBX value defined here?
}
---
Is it documented?
2. Such quest
