Continuing "my what is more readable" thread (just shut me up, but I
don't always agree with i, j, k etc...):
std.string.count:
size_t count(string s, string sub)
{
size_t i;
int j;
int count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < s.length; i += j + sub.length)
{
j = indexOf(s[i .. s
On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:20:07 simendsjo wrote:
> Continuing "my what is more readable" thread (just shut me up, but I
> don't always agree with i, j, k etc...):
Personally, I think that i is just fine in many cases where it's quite clear
what
you're doing. e.g. the standard for loop:
for(
On 10.08.2010 02:40, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:20:07 simendsjo wrote:
Continuing "my what is more readable" thread (just shut me up, but I
don't always agree with i, j, k etc...):
Personally, I think that i is just fine in many cases where it's quite clear
what
you
On 10.08.2010 02:53, simendsjo wrote:
On 10.08.2010 02:40, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:20:07 simendsjo wrote:
Continuing "my what is more readable" thread (just shut me up, but I
don't always agree with i, j, k etc...):
Personally, I think that i is just fine in many
simendsjo:
> And on the other hand; I doubt anything of what I write will ever get
> into phobos!
If you exercise writing D code for few months you will be able contribute to
Phobos2.
Bye,
bearophile
