BCS wrote:
> Hello BCS,
>
>> I have a program that runs an "easily" parallelizable loop. When I run
>> it as a single thread it only takes about 10% longer than 2 threads
>> (on a dual-core). I'm trying to track down the lossed time and am
>> wondering if turning on -profile is even worth looking
BCS wrote:
> Hello BCS,
>
>> I have a program that runs an "easily" parallelizable loop. When I run
>> it as a single thread it only takes about 10% longer than 2 threads
>> (on a dual-core). I'm trying to track down the lossed time and am
>> wondering if turning on -profile is even worth looking
Hello BCS,
I have a program that runs an "easily" parallelizable loop. When I run
it as a single thread it only takes about 10% longer than 2 threads
(on a dual-core). I'm trying to track down the lossed time and am
wondering if turning on -profile is even worth looking at. The concern
is that i
I have a program that runs an "easily" parallelizable loop. When I run it
as a single thread it only takes about 10% longer than 2 threads (on a dual-core).
I'm trying to track down the lossed time and am wondering if turning on -profile
is even worth looking at. The concern is that it might not
