Christopher Wright wrote:
Check this out!
class Foo { int someField; }
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].stringof); // int
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].mangleof); // someField
Why is this? It's counterintuitive.
Okay, no, this example is a shorter version of something else that
exemplified this beha
Christopher Wright wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Check this out!
class Foo { int someField; }
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].stringof); // int
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].mangleof); // someField
Why is this? It's counterintuitive.
Oops, no. mangleof does report the mangled name of the input s
Christopher Wright wrote:
Check this out!
class Foo { int someField; }
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].stringof); // int
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].mangleof); // someField
Why is this? It's counterintuitive.
Oops, no. mangleof does report the mangled name of the input string.
It's just that mang
Check this out!
class Foo { int someField; }
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].stringof); // int
pragma (msg, Foo.tupleof[0].mangleof); // someField
Why is this? It's counterintuitive.