On Monday, 26 March 2018 at 21:11:12 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Is each optimization level `x` in `-Ox` defined in the same
way for clang and ldc? If so, where's the best documentation
for it?
https://wiki.dlang.org/Using_LDC
Thx!
On Monday, 26 March 2018 at 18:47:17 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Yes I am, thanks, via the dub spec
buildType "release-nobounds" {
dflags "-mcpu=native" "-O3"
buildOptions "releaseMode" "optimize" "noBoundsCheck"
"inline"
}
I didn't measure any significant difference between -O
On Monday, 26 March 2018 at 16:02:30 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 22:09:43 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
eventhough I compile with -release -inline -nobounds flags.
Just to make sure: are you passing -O as well?
Yes I am, thanks, via the dub spec
buildType
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 22:09:43 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
eventhough I compile with -release -inline -nobounds flags.
Just to make sure: are you passing -O as well?
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 22:30:50 UTC, kinke wrote:
void foo()
{
version(LDC) pragma(inline, true); // affects foo()
...
}
Wonderful, thanks!
On Sunday, 25 March 2018 at 22:09:43 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
And I haven't found a way to conditionally qualify these inner
loop functions with `pragma(inline, true)` for the ldc case
only.
From https://dlang.org/spec/pragma.html#inline: 'If inside a
function, it affects the function it is
Is there a way to make ldc do more aggressive inlining other than
pragma(inline, true)
?
Reason for asking is that
https://github.com/nordlow/phobos-next/blob/master/src/open_hashmap_or_hashset.d
achieves much better performance when I qualify some inner loop
functions with
