Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-05 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 14:07 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > […] > The problem is that while there is no shortage of complaints about XML > support in D, there is a great dearth of people actually willing to *do* > something about it. In my case it is because I have no need to

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-03 Thread Domain via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Friday, 3 May 2019 at 21:07:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:56:56PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 09:28 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Russel Winder via >

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-03 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:56:56PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 09:28 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn > wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Russel Winder via > > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > > [...] > > > There are

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-03 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 09:28 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Russel Winder via > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > [...] > > There are situations where you create a binding in preference to > > writing something from scratch. cf. gtk,

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 03/05/2019 4:23 AM, Russel Winder wrote: On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 03:50 +1200, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: On 03/05/2019 3:36 AM, Russel Winder wrote: […] libxml2 is definitely usable from Python, it must be usable from D. Of course, I am assuming libxml2 has the

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 2 May 2019 at 15:50:53 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 03/05/2019 3:36 AM, Russel Winder wrote: On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 02:11 +1200, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: […] It does not. Those features come under the big bad guys feature list. Gonna have to go to C

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:23:29PM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...] > There are situations where you create a binding in preference to > writing something from scratch. cf. gtk, gstreamer, etc. so why not > libxml2? [...] No particular reason, except nobody has taken up

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 03:50 +1200, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: > On 03/05/2019 3:36 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > […] > > libxml2 is definitely usable from Python, it must be usable from D. > > Of > > course, I am assuming libxml2 has the facilities required. > > libxml2 is

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 03/05/2019 3:36 AM, Russel Winder wrote: On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 02:11 +1200, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: […] It does not. Those features come under the big bad guys feature list. Gonna have to go to C for it. Surely that means you can use Python, Rust, C++, or D

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-02 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 02:11 +1200, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: […] > > It does not. Those features come under the big bad guys feature list. > > Gonna have to go to C for it. Surely that means you can use Python, Rust, C++, or D rather than having to descend to using C?

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-01 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 02/05/2019 2:04 AM, Domain wrote: On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 at 13:57:04 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 at 13:54:08 UTC, Domain wrote: I need a xml library which support document entity or xinclude. The xml may like this: ]> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude;>        

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-01 Thread Domain via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 at 13:57:04 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 at 13:54:08 UTC, Domain wrote: I need a xml library which support document entity or xinclude. The xml may like this: ]> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude;> Have you looked at this?

Re: Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-01 Thread bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 at 13:54:08 UTC, Domain wrote: I need a xml library which support document entity or xinclude. The xml may like this: ]> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude;> Have you looked at this? https://github.com/jmdavis/dxml

Any full feature xml library available?

2019-05-01 Thread Domain via Digitalmars-d-learn
I need a xml library which support document entity or xinclude. The xml may like this: ]> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude;>