I was refactoring the following line of code:
foo(rand() % 256); -> foo(0);
and that causes Optlink to crash now. Any reason why it does so?
That particular file is just 157 lines long, but the whole project is quite
big, although there are no large files. The biggest one is ~140K, it's from
Denis Koroskin wrote:
I was refactoring the following line of code:
foo(rand() % 256); -> foo(0);
and that causes Optlink to crash now. Any reason why it does so?
That particular file is just 157 lines long, but the whole project is quite
big, although there are no large files. The biggest
Tom S wrote:
>
> And/or compile some modules without -g. Maybe you don't need debug
> symbols everywhere.
>
>
And please vote for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/votes.cgi?action=show_bug&bug_id=424.
Something makes Walter think this bug is not critical.
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
And/or compile some modules without -g. Maybe you don't need debug
symbols everywhere.
And please vote for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/votes.cgi?action=show_bug&bug_id=424.
Something makes Walter think this bug is not critical.
I think he knows... But it
Tom S wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
And/or compile some modules without -g. Maybe you don't need debug
symbols everywhere.
And please vote for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/votes.cgi?action=show_bug&bug_id=424.
Something makes Walter think this bug is not critical.
I think he k
Tom S wrote:
> Max Samukha wrote:
>> Tom S wrote:
>>> And/or compile some modules without -g. Maybe you don't need debug
>>> symbols everywhere.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And please vote for
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/votes.cgi?action=show_bug&bug_id=424.
>> Something makes Walter think this bug is not
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
COFF/ELF output would not be that bad though, at least if there's some
linker that supports these *and* its license allows it to be bundled
with DMD.
I doubt such a linker exists. And if it does, I doubt it is of quality good
enough to replac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
> Max Samukha wrote:
>> Tom S wrote:
>>> Max Samukha wrote:
>>> COFF/ELF output would not be that bad though, at least if there's some
>>> linker that supports these *and* its license allows it to be bundled
>>> with DMD.
>>
>>
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:h7hbe8$1sn...@digitalmars.com...
>I was refactoring the following line of code:
>
> foo(rand() % 256); -> foo(0);
>
> and that causes Optlink to crash now. Any reason why it does so?
>
> That particular file is just 157 lines long, but the
div0 wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
COFF/ELF output would not be that bad though, at least if there's some
linker that supports these *and* its license allows it to be bundled
with DMD.
I doubt such a linker exists. And if it does, I doubt it
div0 wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
Tom S wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
COFF/ELF output would not be that bad though, at least if there's some
linker that supports these *and* its license allows it to be bundled
with DMD.
I doubt s
11 matches
Mail list logo