Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I don't have D1 installed. Can you use enum to declare manifest
constants in D1 or is it a D2 thing?
It's a D2 thing. I believe the D1 way to do it is with static const.
If the string is left in the executable from
const char[]
On 15.07.2010 02:29, strtr wrote:
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I was
wondering why dmd still includes those in the executable (simple text search
dug them up).
As a workaround
strtr st...@sp.am wrote in message news:i1lro6$307...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
strtr:
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my
program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I
strtr st...@sp.am wrote in message news:i1ql53$306...@digitalmars.com...
== Quote from Daniel Murphy (yebbl...@nospamgmail.com)'s article
I think if you use enum instead of const/immutable the compiler is not
meant
to put them in the executable (it might anyway in some/all cases).
eg.
== Quote from strtr (st...@sp.am)'s article
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
strtr:
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my
program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I was
wondering why dmd
strtr:
Too busy reading TDPL? ;)
I have not answered because my answer is not useful: I am sure that constant is
present in the binary, you probably need LDC with Link-Time Optimization
activated to remove them.
btw. how long until runtime mixins? :D
D compiler contains an interpreter.
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I was
wondering why dmd still includes those in the executable (simple text search
dug them up).
strtr:
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I was
wondering why dmd still includes those in the executable (simple text search
dug them up).
Are you able to create a smallish test
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
strtr:
Not that the memory is really significant compared to the rest of my
program,
but I have a few fairly large arrays I use only in compile time and I was
wondering why dmd still includes those in the executable (simple
