On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:46:40 -0400, ketmar ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:20:38 -0400, bitwise wrote:
i believe that you can't do what you want in a way you want, 'cause UFCS
is not working for template args. but you can do this:
alias base(alias CC) =
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:52:19 -0400, anonymous anonym...@example.com
wrote:
abstract class Refl {
@property abstract string name() const;
immutable(Refl) base() const;
}
class ClassRefl(T) : Refl {
@property override string name() const {
return T.stringof;
}
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:52:19 -0400, anonymous anonym...@example.com
wrote:
Parting thoughts:
I don't know where you're heading with this. But so far I don't see what
it would buy you over std.traits and TypeInfo/TypeInfo_Class.
Forgot to mention support for runtime reflection.
See here:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:20:38 -0400, bitwise wrote:
i believe that you can't do what you want in a way you want, 'cause UFCS
is not working for template args. but you can do this:
alias base(alias CC) = reflect!(CC.baseName());
...
static const(Refl) baseRefl = base!refl;
signature.asc
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 15:20:37 UTC, bitwise wrote:
When I uncomment the nicer syntax, I get the errors below:
[1] Error: variable refl cannot be read at compile time
[2] Error: CTFE failed because of previous errors in base
class Base {
double d = 0.4;
}
class Test : Base {
Hi.
I've been building a reflection library for D, but I've hit a snag. If
anyone can help out, it would be much appreciated =D
In the example below, the second line of main() retrieves the reflection
of a base class. Everything is well and good. Now, I am trying to come up
with a more
