On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 04:09:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 03:40:20 UTC, Jack wrote:
Can I rely on this format from fullyQualifiedName? for
example, let's say I do:
```d
enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;
```
where f is a function member of a class. Can I r
On Saturday, 24 April 2021 at 03:40:20 UTC, Jack wrote:
Can I rely on this format from fullyQualifiedName? for example,
let's say I do:
```d
enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;
```
where f is a function member of a class. Can I realy that s[0]
is the module name, s[1] is the class name and s
Can I rely on this format from fullyQualifiedName? for example,
let's say I do:
```d
enum s = fullyQualifiedName!f.split;
```
where f is a function member of a class. Can I realy that s[0] is
the module name, s[1] is the class name and s[2] the functio
name? is this standard or can the compil