Is this known?
I've heard there are many problems with associative arrays.
dmd 2.063
---
module scopefailtest;
int[char] AAarray;
void main(string[] args)
{
AAarray = ['a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3];
foreach(aa; AAarray)
{
scope(failure)continue;
aa = 32;
}
}
---
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 20:45:12 UTC, Anthony Goins wrote:
Is this known?
I've heard there are many problems with associative arrays.
dmd 2.063
---
module scopefailtest;
int[char] AAarray;
void main(string[] args)
{
AAarray = ['a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3];
foreach(aa; AAarray)
{
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 23:26:33 monarch_dodra wrote:
> Which is wrong, since a scope(failure) is not supposed to "catch"
> the exception. In this case, the "continue" short-circuits the
> compiler generated "rethrow".
I thought that there was a bug report on that (probably suggesting that the
Jonathan M Davis:
I thought that there was a bug report on that (probably
suggesting that the
compiler make such a continue illegal), but I can't find it
right now.
If you can't find it, it's better to file it because it's better
to have a bug two times in Bugzilla than no times.
Bye,
bear
On 06/29/2013 02:26 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
DMD is on to something, because if you replace failure with "exit" or
"success", then it complains with: "Error: continue is not inside a loop".
Hmmm... 'continue' and others are disallowed only for scope(exit) and
scope(success):
http://dlang.
Seems like there are several levels of "wrong" actually: What
do you expect "scope(failure)continue" to do exactly?
I was reading an array of files (Document[string]).
Stuck the scope(failure)continue in late at night apparently to
skip reading files that no longer exist.
Forgot about it
