On Saturday, 4 June 2016 at 08:27:53 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 14:01 +0200, Jordi Sayol via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[…]
https://github.com/nomad-software/tkd
I am not a great fan of tk even in Python. It is true that Tk
is everywhere and so meets the portability
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 14:01 +0200, Jordi Sayol via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
>
[…]
> https://github.com/nomad-software/tkd
>
I am not a great fan of tk even in Python. It is true that Tk is
everywhere and so meets the portability requirement, but I would still
go with Qt (well QML anyway) in
How can we build QtE5 and/or the examples?
Download qte5.zip from github. Unzip it to qte5-master.
If you have Windows 32 then copy
qte5-master/windows32/QtE5Widgets32.dll to folder qte5-master.
Copy RunTime Qt-5 (all files and folders from
qte5-master/windows32/rt_Qt5_windows32.zip) to
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 08:57:51 UTC, MGW wrote:
QtE5 - is my wrapper for Qt-5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuOl-4g117E
https://github.com/MGWL/QtE5
How can we build QtE5 and/or the examples?
On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 11:03:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
GKT+ has a reputation for being dreadful on OSX and even worse
on Windows. Qt on the other hand has a reputation for being the
most portable – though clearly wx is (arguable) the most
portable.
QtE5 - is my wrapper for Qt-5
On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 11:03:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Is there even a wxD?
Or perhaps there is an alternative that fits the bill of being
production ready now, and either gives the same UI across all
platforms or provides a platform UI with no change of source
code, just a
On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 11:03:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
From what I can tell QtD is in need of effort or restarting.
I will probably give it another shot when D has better interop
with C++. Particularly, when multiple inheritance of C++
interfaces is implemented, Walter admits that
El 29/05/16 a les 13:03, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn ha escrit:
> GKT+ has a reputation for being dreadful on OSX and even worse on
> Windows. Qt on the other hand has a reputation for being the most
> portable – though clearly wx is (arguable) the most portable.
>
> We have GtkD which
GKT+ has a reputation for being dreadful on OSX and even worse on
Windows. Qt on the other hand has a reputation for being the most
portable – though clearly wx is (arguable) the most portable.
We have GtkD which is brilliant, especially as it has GStreamer
support.
From what I can tell QtD is
