On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 11:52:34 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:41:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Ping!?
I think you'd be more likely to get responses to this sort of
question in the main group, not D.lea
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:41:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Ping!?
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Two cases come to my mind:
A: Non-Templated Function: must be @safe (or perhaps @trusted)
pure and parameter must qualified as const (or in).
B: Templated Function: Usage of parameter in body must be
non-mutating; meaning no lhs of
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 08:52:23 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in
a given scope? If not where could this information be extracted
(in which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if
so, be stored?
I'm guessing
Scope:
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in a
given scope? If not where could this information be extracted (in
which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if so,
be stored?
Reason: After having read about Rust's data-flow (and in turn
escape) analysis I'm ver
