On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 13:54:41 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
Yeah, that's the idea. Though I just thought of a possibility
using an isPublicInterface template. Is that what you meant by
templates and duck typing?
Not sure about what that template does, but the idea behind
ranges is
On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 at 02:14:53 UTC, evilrat wrote:
like this?
--
[snip]
-
there is also way to do this using templates and duck typing, I
think it will be more idiomatic way since ranges and stuff
heavily use
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 19:31:52 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
Basically, I want to define a common interface for a group of
platform-specific classes, except that they should ideally also
share constructor parameters. What I want to do is then alias
them to a common name, selecting the
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 17:52:09 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 02:15:21 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
What it says on the tin. Is there a way to create interfaces
with a constructor or must I use an abstract class.
What do you want to do in your constructor? I can't think of
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 02:15:21 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
What it says on the tin. Is there a way to create interfaces
with a constructor or must I use an abstract class.
What do you want to do in your constructor? I can't think of
anything that wouldn't change some state, either of the
What it says on the tin. Is there a way to create interfaces with
a constructor or must I use an abstract class.
Additionally, is there a way to force the linker to link a
function in a class without an implementation with another that
does have an implementation?
i.e.
---
//module a;
