On 2011-03-15 21:13:36 +0100, Michel Fortin said:
Oh, it's much older than that:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2128
I'm not sure it's the same thing, but I realize it's hard to say given
Magnus in his original post didn't mention how he attempts to
instantiate the template.
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
function, rather than a type (such as Foo), if you want the compiler to
deduce the compile-time parameters. (Right?)
Now
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland mag...@hetland.org said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
function, rather than a type (such as Foo), if
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:36:04 +0100, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland mag...@hetland.org
said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using
On 2011-03-15 13:20:30 -0400, Simen kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com said:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:36:04 +0100, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland mag...@hetland.org said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T
