On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 22:46:59 bioinfornatics wrote:
> so we should to use O_RDONLY fnrom which module?
Well, for whatever reason, it's in core.stdc.stdio on Windows, so if you're on
Windows, that's what you'd use, whereas on Posix systems, it's in
core.sys.posix.fcntl. I would have _thoug
On Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 17:48:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 18:50:26 bioinfornatics wrote:
i think they are some duplicate data between std.c.stdio and
core.sys.posix.fcntl
Both module define
O_RDONLY O_WRONLY, O_RDWR, O_APPEND,O_CREAT, O_TRUNC,
O_EXCL
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 18:50:26 bioinfornatics wrote:
> i think they are some duplicate data between std.c.stdio and
> core.sys.posix.fcntl
>
> Both module define
> O_RDONLY O_WRONLY, O_RDWR, O_APPEND,O_CREAT, O_TRUNC,
> O_EXCL
>
> maybe std.c.stdio should to use
i think they are some duplicate data between std.c.stdio and
core.sys.posix.fcntl
Both module define
O_RDONLY O_WRONLY, O_RDWR, O_APPEND,O_CREAT, O_TRUNC,
O_EXCL
maybe std.c.stdio should to use version poix winows and whatever
to load these data
