On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 00:32:49 UTC, Uknown wrote:
Adding a destructor makes the compiler return an error about
lifetimes, with or without -dip1000
Thanks. Filed, mentioning this:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18756
On Wednesday, 11 April 2018 at 16:25:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Adding a destructor makes the compiler return an error about
lifetimes, with or without -dip1000
https://run.dlang.io/is/ddXqNu
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 16:08:06 Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is this a known bug? With v2.079.0, with or without -dip1000:
>
> @safe unittest
> {
> struct S
> {
> int i;
> }
> auto p = ().i;
> }
>
> The address of field `i` should not escape,
Is this a known bug? With v2.079.0, with or without -dip1000:
@safe unittest
{
struct S
{
int i;
}
auto p = ().i;
}
The address of field `i` should not escape, right? It's also
incorrectly allowed when using an lvalue of S (when -dip1000 is
not present).
