On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 07:30 +, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> […]
>
> 1. There is OS threads. Context-switching is very expensive
> because during it we should to save ALL CPU registers to RAM.
> Accessing to RAM is slowly up 200-300 times then accessing to
> registers, so
On 28/08/2016 3:36 AM, Suliman wrote:
Message passing is an alternative to relying on globals + mutex's. In
the end its implemented by a global + stack FIFO (mailbox).
Where it's better? Could you give an example?
It is my personal goto when dealing with some form of event loop. Since
you
Message passing is an alternative to relying on globals +
mutex's. In the end its implemented by a global + stack FIFO
(mailbox).
Where it's better? Could you give an example?
Ring transition e.g. system calls are not all that expensive.
Its what the kernel does with that system call that is
On 27/08/2016 7:30 PM, Suliman wrote:
Hello! I am still attempt to better understand how concurrency works. I
read a lot of info but still misunderstood some key-points.
Here is my thought about it and questions:
1. There is OS threads. Context-switching is very expensive because
during it we
Hello! I am still attempt to better understand how concurrency
works. I read a lot of info but still misunderstood some
key-points.
Here is my thought about it and questions:
1. There is OS threads. Context-switching is very expensive
because during it we should to save ALL CPU registers to
