Re: Format g bug ?

2017-08-09 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 8/9/17 4:10 PM, Temtaime wrote: Sorry, messed up numbers Expected: 3.11 3.11 3.1 3.1 Seems g outputs one digit less I was bugged by this too. It's not a bug. For the %f specifier, the number represents the number of digits *after* the decimal. For the %g specifier, the number

Re: Format g bug ?

2017-08-09 Thread Temtaime via Digitalmars-d-learn
Sorry, messed up numbers Expected: 3.11 3.11 3.1 3.1 Seems g outputs one digit less

Format g bug ?

2017-08-09 Thread Temtaime via Digitalmars-d-learn
import std.stdio; void main() { writefln(`%.2g`, 3.11); writefln(`%.2f`, 3.11); writefln(`%.1g`, 3.11); writefln(`%.1f`, 3.11); } 3.1 3.11 3 3.1 But expected 3.1 3.11 3.1 3.11