On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 21:06:52 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I realize that this is likely really pushing the compile time
generation but a recent change to the switch statement[1] is
surfacing because of this usage.
uninitswitch2.d(13): Deprecation: 'switch' skips declaration of
On 04/17/2017 09:29 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 21:33:28 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
By the way, in my opinion, `case li[0]:` shouldn't compile with the
static immutable `list`. `list` and `li[0]` are dynamic values. The
compiler only attempts (and succeeds) to
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 21:33:28 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
That's not a static foreach. It's a normal run-time foreach.
The switch jumps into the loop body without the loop head ever
executing. The compiler is correct when it says that
initialization of li is being skipped.
Good good. I did
On 04/13/2017 11:06 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
-
[...]
private static immutable list = AliasSeq!(
tuple("a", "q"),
tuple("b", "r"),
);
[...]
switch(search) {
--->foreach(li; list) { // li initialization is skipped
I realize that this is likely really pushing the compile time
generation but a recent change to the switch statement[1] is
surfacing because of this usage.
uninitswitch2.d(13): Deprecation: 'switch' skips declaration of
variable uninits
witch2.main.li at uninitswitch2.d(14)
