On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Matthew Ong wrote:
> On 5/23/2011 3:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-23 00:09, Matthew Ong wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks everyone that gave some working model to a newbie from Java Space.
>
> I found the working file layout model from dwt2
> http://hg.dsource.org/p
On 5/23/2011 3:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 2011-05-23 00:09, Matthew Ong wrote:
Thanks everyone that gave some working model to a newbie from Java Space.
I found the working file layout model from dwt2
http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt2
There is a dwt2\base\src
Haha. That is exactly like wh
On 2011-05-23 00:09, Matthew Ong wrote:
> On 5/21/2011 7:16 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 04:35 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > [ . . . ]
> >
> >> Subversion handles multiple people editing the same file perfectly fine.
> >> But Hg probably is better than SVN, overall. I've b
On 2011-05-23 00:09, Matthew Ong wrote:
> On 5/21/2011 7:16 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 04:35 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > [ . . . ]
> >
> >> Subversion handles multiple people editing the same file perfectly fine.
> >> But Hg probably is better than SVN, overall. I've
On 5/21/2011 7:16 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 04:35 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
Subversion handles multiple people editing the same file perfectly fine. But
Hg probably is better than SVN, overall. I've been a happy SVN user for a
long time, but even I'm starting t
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 04:35 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Subversion handles multiple people editing the same file perfectly fine. But
> Hg probably is better than SVN, overall. I've been a happy SVN user for a
> long time, but even I'm starting to get won over by Hg. Of course, some
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:ir7qio$28mn$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/20/2011 4:23 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Matthew Ong" wrote in message
>> news:ir3801$84b$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> As for the real reason it is for:
>>> That current D layout seem to limit that one file to a
On 5/20/2011 4:23 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:ir3801$84b$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/14/2011 3:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jason House" wrote in message
But yea, one-class-per-file is really a Java thing (and then a few other
Not true entirely, the
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:ir3801$84b$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/14/2011 3:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Jason House" wrote in message
>
> > But yea, one-class-per-file is really a Java thing (and then a few other
> Not true entirely, the limit is one public class per file. Ther
On 5/14/2011 3:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jason House" wrote in message
> But yea, one-class-per-file is really a Java thing (and then a few other
Not true entirely, the limit is one public class per file. There is no
actual limit for such:
// The file must be ClassA.java
public class C
Alexander wrote:
> On 18.05.2011 19:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> What D does is completely normal and common. It just doesn't match Java
>> and C#.
>
> To be honest, I didn't see any single source file with ca. 3 lines
> in it (like std.datetime) for quite a while :)
>
> Probably,
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> On 5/13/2011 3:51 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> > On 13.05.2011 00:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> >> Still, I wouldn't have though that dashes would have been a big enough
>> >> deal to really care.
>> >>
>> > I didn't say that this is a "big deal", just "inconvenience".
>> >
Matthew Ong Wrote:
> I agreed with what alexander is voicing out. How about the process
> within a team development. That current D layout seem to limit that one
> file to a single developer. Instead of multiple class multiple developer
> within the same module.
> Using the example:
> HashMap &
On 18.05.2011 19:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> What D does is completely normal and common. It just doesn't match Java and
> C#.
To be honest, I didn't see any single source file with ca. 3 lines in it
(like std.datetime) for quite a while :)
Probably, I am old-fashioned, but this amou
> On 5/13/2011 3:51 PM, Alexander wrote:
> > On 13.05.2011 00:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> Still, I wouldn't have though that dashes would have been a big enough
> >> deal to really care.
> >>
> > I didn't say that this is a "big deal", just "inconvenience".
> >
> > There are many minor thing
On 5/13/2011 3:51 PM, Alexander wrote:
On 13.05.2011 00:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Still, I wouldn't have though that dashes would have been a big enough deal to
really care.
I didn't say that this is a "big deal", just "inconvenience".
There are many minor things which are not a big
"Jason House" wrote in message
news:iqjamt$1e5b$1...@digitalmars.com...
>I wonder a bit why you want one file per object? Is it to avoid unnecessary
>imports? Make finding object definitions easier? Or a style preference? I
>think replies by others covered all but the first question. I use the
I wonder a bit why you want one file per object? Is it to avoid unnecessary
imports? Make finding object definitions easier? Or a style preference? I think
replies by others covered all but the first question. I use the "import
std.foo: bar, baz;" syntax for that.
Generally speaking, separating
On 13.05.2011 00:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Still, I wouldn't have though that dashes would have been a big enough deal
> to really care.
I didn't say that this is a "big deal", just "inconvenience".
There are many minor things which are not a big deal, but make life a bit
less convenie
"Alexander" wrote in message
news:iqh6gk$hpn$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 12.05.2011 17:05, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> A module is always one file and only one file.
>
> ...which could be really, really big due to this limitation
> (std.datetime), and this is not always convenient sometimes -
> On 12.05.2011 20:34, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > It's generally easy for _you_ to find them too, because the import tells
> > you where they are (the fact that you can have multiply directories
> > being searched for imports being the main complicating factor). It's
> > what pretty much any D pro
On 12.05.2011 20:34, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> It's generally easy for _you_ to find them too, because the import tells you
> where
> they are (the fact that you can have multiply directories being searched for
> imports being the main complicating factor). It's what pretty much any D
> progra
"Matthew Ong" wrote in message
news:iqgnj9$2n0j$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
> According to:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=135947
>
> And also source code within dmd2/src
> It seems that there is only one file per module.
>
>
> > For small projects this is OK, but for large - not quite, IMHO.
>
> I don't know about that. I always compile everything at once
> now - in my experience, it's negligibly slower than linking alone.
>
> druntime: compiled all at once takes ~1 second on my box. 65k lines of
> (light) code.
>
>
On 12/05/2011 19:25, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Maybe million line programs will be unacceptably slow, but I don't
know, I'd have to actually see it being a problem in practice
before I get worked up about it. tbh I wouldn't be surprised if
the incremental build was actually slower than the all at once in
> For small projects this is OK, but for large - not quite, IMHO.
I don't know about that. I always compile everything at once
now - in my experience, it's negligibly slower than linking alone.
druntime: compiled all at once takes ~1 second on my box. 65k lines of (light)
code.
phobos: compiled
On 12.05.2011 19:53, Adam Ruppe wrote:
> If you use the module declaration at the top of the file and manually
> list the files on the command line, the file and directory names don't
> matter.
Right, but this, in turn, forces me to recompile all of my modules after
every change, no matter whe
> so I couldn't have different namespaces (on different levels) in
> single directory, and this also forces me to match file
> name with module name.
No, it doesn't. You're right that it splits when it searches, but it
doesn't *have* to search.
If you use the module declaration at the top of the
On 12.05.2011 17:05, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> A module is always one file and only one file.
...which could be really, really big due to this limitation (std.datetime),
and this is not always convenient sometimes - that's why I like the idea of
namespaces and partial classes.
There is ano
On 2011-05-12 06:33, Matthew Ong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group
> =digitalmars.D&artnum=135947
>
> And also source code within dmd2/src
> It seems that there is only one file per module.
>
> Is module similar to a sing
Hi Adam,
Ok. Just to be very clear here. Please help to validate.
>Common interfaces for both HashMap, LinkedList and hashlist.
>But they should be all be in different source file(HashMap.d, >LinkedList.d,
HashList.d)..
To have import for:
module CornerCube.Collections
class HashMap{...}
I w
Use folders as a collection of modules.
foo/bar.d => import foo.bar;
You don't actually have to separate them into folders - the directory
layout is up to you. But this is the simplest method.
Learn more here:
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/module.html
Hi,
According to:
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=135947
And also source code within dmd2/src
It seems that there is only one file per module.
Is module similar to a single java package and namespace in VC++/C#?
If yes, most name
33 matches
Mail list logo
