On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 07:19:31 UTC, bauss wrote:
Yes and in addition to Ali's message then remember it's
private for the module only.
Oops typo.
What I meant is that private is module level, so it's __not__
private in the module, but it is for other modules.
Thanks for the reply.
On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 02:22:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Looks good to me.
There are other ways as well:
Thanks a lot. All I wanted to implement more than ctor with
different parameters and avoid code duplication.
On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 07:18:44 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 00:18:03 UTC, Vinod K Chandran
wrote:
Hi all,
Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use
private constructors ?
```d
class Foo {
int p1 ;
string p2 ;
bool p3 ;
private this(in
On Monday, 25 April 2022 at 00:18:03 UTC, Vinod K Chandran wrote:
Hi all,
Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use
private constructors ?
```d
class Foo {
int p1 ;
string p2 ;
bool p3 ;
private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
this.p1 = a
thi
On 4/24/22 17:18, Vinod K Chandran wrote:
> private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
Looks good to me.
There are other ways as well:
class Foo {
private:
// ...
public:
// ...
}
Or:
class Foo {
private {
// ...
}
// ...
}
Ali
Hi all,
Please take a look at this code. Is this the right way to use
private constructors ?
```d
class Foo {
int p1 ;
string p2 ;
bool p3 ;
private this(int a, string b, bool c) {
this.p1 = a
this.p2 = b
this.p3 = c
}
this(int a) {
this(
