On Wednesday, 16 June 2021 at 05:48:21 UTC, VitaliiY wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:39:40 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:18:26 UTC, VitaliiY wrote:
[...]
```D
enum string ADDBITS(string a, string b) = `
{
bitbuffer = (bitbuffer<<(`~a~`))|((`~b~`)&((1<<`~a~`)-1));
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:39:40 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:18:26 UTC, VitaliiY wrote:
[...]
```D
enum string ADDBITS(string a, string b) = `
{
bitbuffer = (bitbuffer<<(`~a~`))|((`~b~`)&((1<<`~a~`)-1));
numbits += (`~a~`);
mixin(STOREBITS);
}`;
// on use:
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:38:15 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 6/15/21 5:18 AM, VitaliiY wrote:
> STOREBITS and ADDBITS use variables defined in STARTDATA
If possible in your use case, I would put those variables in a
struct type and make add() a member function. However, a
similar type alre
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 12:18:26 UTC, VitaliiY wrote:
It's simple with STARTDATA as mixin, but STOREBITS and ADDBITS
use variables defined in STARTDATA scope, so I can't understand
how to do mixin template with it.
If the code duplication isn't too bad, consider just expanding
the C macro
On 6/15/21 5:18 AM, VitaliiY wrote:
> STOREBITS and ADDBITS use variables defined in STARTDATA
If possible in your use case, I would put those variables in a struct
type and make add() a member function. However, a similar type already
exists as std.bitmanip.BitArray.
Ali
Could anybody help with translation of this C macro to D
mixin/mixin template? Here a - unsigned char, b - int. It's
simple with STARTDATA as mixin, but STOREBITS and ADDBITS use
variables defined in STARTDATA scope, so I can't understand how
to do mixin template with it.
#define STARTDAT
