On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 00:46:05 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 13:22:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
As for now, I know no compiler that can do that.
GCC can do it. Somewhat notoriously, LTO can lead to bugs from
underspecified asm constraints following cross-TU inlini
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 00:46:05 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 13:22:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
As for now, I know no compiler that can do that.
GCC can do it. Somewhat notoriously,
you meant "infamously" ?
LTO can lead to bugs from underspecified asm constraint
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 15:10:19 UTC, max haughton wrote:
Not always. The attribute is intended for naked asm since
inlining could be completely wrong in this case.
Got that! Thanks for the info!
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 11:32:16 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 19:22:33 UTC, max haughton
wrote:
There's an attribute to tell it the function is safe to inline.
And can't you do that with inline asm?
Not always. The attribute is intended for naked asm since
inl
On Friday, 12 November 2021 at 00:46:05 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
GCC can do it. Somewhat notoriously, LTO can lead to bugs from
underspecified asm constraints following cross-TU inlining.
That's really interesting to hear! Do we have any cases where
this happened to software that was used for pr
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 19:22:33 UTC, max haughton wrote:
There's an attribute to tell it the function is safe to inline.
And can't you do that with inline asm?
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 13:22:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
As for now, I know no compiler that can do that.
GCC can do it. Somewhat notoriously, LTO can lead to bugs from
underspecified asm constraints following cross-TU inlining.
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 17:29:33 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 13:22:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yes, this is still the case. A particularity of DMD inliner is
that it does its job in the front-end, so inlining asm is
totally impossible. Then, even if inlining was
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 13:22:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Yes, this is still the case. A particularity of DMD inliner is
that it does its job in the front-end, so inlining asm is
totally impossible. Then, even if inlining was done in the
backend inlining of asm would not be guaranteed b
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 12:05:14 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
You really shouldn't expect dmd to inline *anything*.
Or to optimize anything for that matter. That isn't its
strength.
Oh yeah! I just thought to ask anyway! Thanks a lot for your time!
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 08:58:43 UTC, rempas wrote:
I've seen from
[this](https://forum.dlang.org/post/op.vrzngqeavxi10f@biotronic-laptop) reply in a thread from 2011 that DMD will not inline functions that contain inline assembly. Is this still the case?
Yes, this is still the case. A
On Thursday, 11 November 2021 at 08:58:43 UTC, rempas wrote:
I've seen from
[this](https://forum.dlang.org/post/op.vrzngqeavxi10f@biotronic-laptop) reply in a thread from 2011 that DMD will not inline functions that contain inline assembly. Is this still the case?
You really shouldn't expect dm
I've seen from
[this](https://forum.dlang.org/post/op.vrzngqeavxi10f@biotronic-laptop) reply in a thread from 2011 that DMD will not inline functions that contain inline assembly. Is this still the case?
13 matches
Mail list logo
