On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 12:32:34 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
With -preview=nosharedaccess, I get:
int y = 2;
shared int x = y; // OK
assert(x == 2); // no error
y = x; // error
So for the assignment to y, reading x is an error and
atomicLoad should be used instead. But
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 12:32:34 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
With -preview=nosharedaccess, I get:
int y = 2;
shared int x = y; // OK
assert(x == 2); // no error
y = x; // error
This also does not error:
```d
bool b = x == 3;
```
Filed:
With -preview=nosharedaccess, I get:
int y = 2;
shared int x = y; // OK
assert(x == 2); // no error
y = x; // error
So for the assignment to y, reading x is an error and atomicLoad
should be used instead. But is it an oversight that reading x in
the assert is not an error?
