On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 23:19:17 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
[#20699](https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20699) must
be non-trivial to fix, so I'm exploring makefiles. If possible
I'd like to keep dub for dependency management though, just not
for actual compilation.
That bug is fixed
On Saturday, 5 November 2022 at 12:17:14 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
But yes, it has two others (although idk how much they get
used, or how complete).
Using the first two all the time.
IIRC VisualD projects respect --combined
On 05.11.22 12:38, rikki cattermole wrote:
We have a few build formats that dub can generate for you automatically:
```
visuald - VisualD project files
sublimetext - SublimeText project file
cmake - CMake build scripts
build - Builds the package directly
```
Unfortunately none of them are make,
On 06/11/2022 1:16 AM, Imperatorn wrote:
On Saturday, 5 November 2022 at 11:38:09 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
We have a few build formats that dub can generate for you automatically:
```
visuald - VisualD project files
sublimetext - SublimeText project file
cmake - CMake build scripts
build -
On Saturday, 5 November 2022 at 11:38:09 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
We have a few build formats that dub can generate for you
automatically:
```
visuald - VisualD project files
sublimetext - SublimeText project file
cmake - CMake build scripts
build - Builds the package directly
```
Unfortun
We have a few build formats that dub can generate for you automatically:
```
visuald - VisualD project files
sublimetext - SublimeText project file
cmake - CMake build scripts
build - Builds the package directly
```
Unfortunately none of them are make, it would be nice to have that if
you are l
On 11/4/22 7:19 PM, Anonymouse wrote:
[#20699](https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20699) must be
non-trivial to fix, so I'm exploring makefiles. If possible I'd like to
keep dub for dependency management though, just not for actual compilation.
Is it at all possible (or even desireable)
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:19:17PM +, Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> [#20699](https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20699) must be
> non-trivial to fix, so I'm exploring makefiles. If possible I'd like
> to keep dub for dependency management though, just not for actual
> compil
[#20699](https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20699) must be
non-trivial to fix, so I'm exploring makefiles. If possible I'd
like to keep dub for dependency management though, just not for
actual compilation.
Is it at all possible (or even desireable) to construct a
makefile that builds d
