On Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 22:35:51 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
class Patt
{
// It is better then your static if.
// Compiler will raise better error message for incorrect
operator.
Seq opBinary(string op)(Patt rhs) if (op == ~)
{
return opCatImpl(rhs);
}
in the unittest at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/symbolic.d#L347
Isn't it possible to do operator overloading in an abstract
base-class?
On Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 22:10:28 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
In my module symbolic.d at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/symbolic.d
is it somehow possible to overload binary operator ~ on pairs
of instances SPatt?
As usual I had done a couple of mistakes...which are solved know
On 11/20/2014 02:18 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 22:10:28 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
In my module symbolic.d at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/symbolic.d
is it somehow possible to overload binary operator ~ on pairs of
instances SPatt?
As usual I had done a
/justd/blob/master/symbolic.d#L332
is not called in the unittest at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/symbolic.d#L347
Isn't it possible to do operator overloading in an abstract
base-class?
Seq opBinary(string op)(Patt rhs)
{
static if (op == ~)
{
return seq
