On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 05:29:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 07:15:19 Eric wrote:
I should have also added that the overloaded ! method returns a
class instance and not a bool.
Well, at that point, you're completely out of luck with regards
to overloading
!.
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 07:15:19 Eric wrote:
> I should have also added that the overloaded ! method returns a
> class instance and not a bool.
Well, at that point, you're completely out of luck with regards to overloading
!. In general, D doesn't really support overloading operators in a man
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 07:14:36 cal wrote:
> But that code I posted does work, and gives the output shown. Am
> I misunderstanding?
Then my understanding of how ! is handled is wrong. Apparently !s does get
replaced with !cast(bool)s, or it couldn't work. But note that
bool b = s;
doesn't
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:59:19 UTC, cal wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:06:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah, that should work for the conditions in if, while, and
for loops but
won't work for anything else (_maybe_ ternary operators, but
I'm not sure).
So, if you need to be
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 05:08:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 06:59:14 cal wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:06:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> Yeah, that should work for the conditions in if, while, and
> for
> loops but
> won't work for anything els
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 06:59:14 cal wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:06:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Yeah, that should work for the conditions in if, while, and for
> > loops but
> > won't work for anything else (_maybe_ ternary operators, but
> > I'm not sure).
> > So, if
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:06:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah, that should work for the conditions in if, while, and for
loops but
won't work for anything else (_maybe_ ternary operators, but
I'm not sure).
So, if you need to be able to do !obj in the general case,
that's not going t
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 04:16:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/25/2013 09:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 05:35:03 cal wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 02:50:51 UTC, Eric wrote:
>>> Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to
get
>>> it t
On 06/25/2013 09:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 05:35:03 cal wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 02:50:51 UTC, Eric wrote:
>>> Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
>>> it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this
>>> becaus
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 05:35:03 cal wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 02:50:51 UTC, Eric wrote:
> > Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
> > it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this
> > because
> > I am making a wrapper for a C++ API that has !
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 02:50:51 UTC, Eric wrote:
Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this
because
I am making a wrapper for a C++ API that has ! overloaded.
-Eric
According to http://dlang.org/operatorov
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 04:50:44 Eric wrote:
> Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
> it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this because
> I am making a wrapper for a C++ API that has ! overloaded.
TDPL does not list it as an overloadable operator, so
Eric:
Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this
because
I am making a wrapper for a C++ API that has ! overloaded.
D is not a superset of C++ and I think there is no way to
overload the ! alone. This is by desig
Is there a way to overload the ! operator? I can't seem to get
it to work with the standard unaryOp method. I need this because
I am making a wrapper for a C++ API that has ! overloaded.
-Eric
14 matches
Mail list logo
