Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:51:45 +0400, Sergey Gromov wrote:
> Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:07:43 +0200, BLS wrote:
>
>> Sergey Gromov wrote:
>>> Sorry, I'm not a guru at all, so ActiveX was a misnomer. What I'm
>>> writing is a simple in-process server DLL which implements a couple of
>>> interfaces.
>>
>> Oh
Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:07:30 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:09:12 -0400, Sergey Gromov
> wrote:
>
>> Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:54:40 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>>> LOOKUP_TABLE[0] = Method("method1", &Component.method1);
>>> LOOKUP_TABLE[1] = Me
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:56:41 -0400, grauzone wrote:
LOOKUP_TABLE[0] = Method("method1", &Component.method1);
LOOKUP_TABLE[1] = Method("method2", &Component.method2);
These two lines are weird. ``pragma(msg)`` shows that type of
``&method1`` is ``void function()`` while it m
LOOKUP_TABLE[0] = Method("method1", &Component.method1);
LOOKUP_TABLE[1] = Method("method2", &Component.method2);
These two lines are weird. ``pragma(msg)`` shows that type of
``&method1`` is ``void function()`` while it must be ``void delegate()``
for a non-static member beca
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:09:12 -0400, Sergey Gromov
wrote:
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:54:40 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:47:30 -0400, Sergey Gromov
wrote:
Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of
pointer
to method, and later call it for an
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:54:40 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:47:30 -0400, Sergey Gromov
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of pointer
>> to method, and later call it for an actual object instance?
>
> I don't know why the "non
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:07:43 +0200, BLS wrote:
> Sergey Gromov wrote:
>> Sorry, I'm not a guru at all, so ActiveX was a misnomer. What I'm
>> writing is a simple in-process server DLL which implements a couple of
>> interfaces.
>
> Oh, that's sad. :(
>
> well, especially in this case I would sugge
Sergey Gromov wrote:
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:37:42 +0200, BLS wrote:
Sorry, I'm not a guru at all, so ActiveX was a misnomer. What I'm
writing is a simple in-process server DLL which implements a couple of
interfaces.
Oh, that's sad. :(
well, especially in this case I would suggest to have a
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:47:30 -0400, Sergey Gromov
wrote:
Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of pointer
to method, and later call it for an actual object instance?
I don't know why the "non constant expression error" happens, but
constructing a delegate from func
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:11:14 + (UTC), BCS wrote:
> Hello Sergey,
>
>> Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of
>> pointer to method, and later call it for an actual object instance?
>>
>
> dosn't work but might point you in the right direction:
>
> template Pn2Fn(R, ch
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:37:42 +0200, BLS wrote:
>Sergey Gromov wrote:
>> Use case: I'm writing an ActiveX plug-in for a dynamic language. The
>
> However, I am _very_ interested in having/seeing the source of a very
> basic ActiveX control. Any chance that you share the core implementation
> with u
Sergey Gromov wrote:
Use case: I'm writing an ActiveX plug-in for a dynamic language. The
class Component : IUnknown
WOW!
But shouldn't you use
class Component : IDispatch
{
HRESULT QueryInterface( REFIID riid, LPVOID * ppvObj) {};
ULONG AddRef() {};
ULONG Release(){};
// plu
Hello Sergey,
Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of
pointer to method, and later call it for an actual object instance?
dosn't work but might point you in the right direction:
template Pn2Fn(R, char[] method)
{
ReturnTypeOf!(mixin("R." ~ method)) Pn2Fn(R r, Arg
Is there a way to declare and statically initialize some sort of pointer
to method, and later call it for an actual object instance?
Use case: I'm writing an ActiveX plug-in for a dynamic language. The
language queries the component for implemented methods, then it requests
these methods to be ex
14 matches
Mail list logo
