On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 11:18:48 UTC, bauss wrote:
It's one thing D really misses, but is really hard to implement
when it wasn't thought of to begin with. It should have been
implemented alongside functions that may change between
languages and cultures.
I guess we have another task
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 06:34:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 18 August 2022 at 17:15:12 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/08/2022 4:56 AM, IGotD- wrote:
BetterC means no arrays or strings library and usually in
terminal tools you need to process text. Full D is wonderful
On Thursday, 18 August 2022 at 17:15:12 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Unicode support in Full D isn't complete.
There is nothing in phobos to even change case correctly!
Both are limited if you care about certain stuff like non-latin
based languages like Turkic.
I think full D is fine for
On Thursday, 18 August 2022 at 17:15:12 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/08/2022 4:56 AM, IGotD- wrote:
BetterC means no arrays or strings library and usually in
terminal tools you need to process text. Full D is wonderful
for such task but betterC would be limited unless you want to
write
On 19/08/2022 4:56 AM, IGotD- wrote:
BetterC means no arrays or strings library and usually in terminal tools
you need to process text. Full D is wonderful for such task but betterC
would be limited unless you want to write your own array and string
functionality.
Unicode support in Full D
On Wednesday, 17 August 2022 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 8/17/22 09:28, Diego wrote:
> I'm writing a little terminal tool, so i think `-betterC` is
the best
> and simple solution in my case.
It depends on what you mean with terminal tool bun in general,
no, full features of D is
On Wednesday, 17 August 2022 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 8/17/22 09:28, Diego wrote:
> I'm writing a little terminal tool, so i think `-betterC` is
the best
> and simple solution in my case.
It depends on what you mean with terminal tool bun in general,
no, full features of D is
On 8/17/22 09:28, Diego wrote:
> I'm writing a little terminal tool, so i think `-betterC` is the best
> and simple solution in my case.
It depends on what you mean with terminal tool bun in general, no, full
features of D is the most useful option.
I've written a family of programs that
Thank you to everyone,
I'm writing a little terminal tool, so i think `-betterC` is the
best and simple solution in my case.
On 8/16/22 4:25 AM, Diego wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm a Java programmer at work but i'm learning D for pleasure. I'm
reading _The D Programming Language by Ali Çehreli_.
I noticed that DMD creates very huge executable, for example an empty
program:
```
empty.d:
void main() {
}
```
after
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 08:25:18 UTC, Diego wrote:
after a compilation with these flags `dmd -de -w empty.d` i
have an executable of 869KiB
It seams huge in my opinion for an empty program
What are the best practices to reduce the size?
If compile speed and verbose error codes are not
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 08:25:18 UTC, Diego wrote:
It seams huge in my opinion for an empty program
What are the best practices to reduce the size?
The problem is that the druntime, the run time library needed to
support many D features, is large and linked in its entirety by
default.
On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 08:25:18 UTC, Diego wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm a Java programmer at work but i'm learning D for pleasure.
I'm reading _The D Programming Language by Ali Çehreli_.
I noticed that DMD creates very huge executable, for example an
empty program:
```
empty.d:
Hello everyone,
I'm a Java programmer at work but i'm learning D for pleasure.
I'm reading _The D Programming Language by Ali Çehreli_.
I noticed that DMD creates very huge executable, for example an
empty program:
```
empty.d:
void main() {
}
```
after a compilation with these
14 matches
Mail list logo
