I wouldn't hold my breath.
"simendsjo" wrote in message
news:jgoejk$23j1$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 02/06/2012 11:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> "simendsjo" wrote in message
>> news:jgo9if$1mg9$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?
>>
>> I don't thi
On 02/06/2012 11:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"simendsjo" wrote in message
news:jgo9if$1mg9$1...@digitalmars.com...
Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?
I don't think so.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/652
"simendsjo" wrote in message
news:jgo9if$1mg9$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Should purity be checked at all if used with an enum?
I don't think so.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/652
Not sure if this is a bug, or just some missing functionality of pure.
void f() pure {
enum a = to!string("a"); // some legal compile-time to!()
}
Gives "to is not pure"
The following works:
template S(alias v) {
enum S = to!string(v);
}
void g() pure {
enum a = S!"a";
}
Should purity b
