On 29.3.2012 13:05, simendsjo wrote:
> It's not string mixins:
> mixin template XIA() {
> void a() { ... } // regular function
> }
> class X : IA {
> mixin XIA!()
> }
>
> XIA is injected into X, so X now looks like
> class X : IA {
> void a() { ... }
> }
I should have thought and experiment
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:58:56 +0200, Martin Drasar
wrote:
On 29.3.2012 12:02, simendsjo wrote:
Your looking for partial classes? D doesn't have this as far as I know.
"alias this" should work for more than one value in the future, and then
(I think) you should be able to do something like th
On 29.3.2012 12:02, simendsjo wrote:
> Your looking for partial classes? D doesn't have this as far as I know.
>
> "alias this" should work for more than one value in the future, and then
> (I think) you should be able to do something like this:
>
> class XIB : IB {}
> class XIA : IA {}
> class X
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:31:57 +0200, Martin Drasar
wrote:
On 29.3.2012 11:16, simendsjo wrote:
D has interface files, .di. These can be automatically generated by the
compiler using the -H switch.
(snip)
I would like to split the X class definition into two files. One file
would implemen
On 29.3.2012 11:16, simendsjo wrote:
>
> D has interface files, .di. These can be automatically generated by the
> compiler using the -H switch.
>
> So you code your class normally:
> a.d:
> class A
> {
> void a() {}
> void b() {}
> }
>
> $ dmd -H a.d
> $ cat a.di
> // D import file gene
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:33:03 +0200, Martin Drasar
wrote:
Hi,
I have a class that implements a lot of interfaces and I would like to
separate the definition into different files, i.e. implementation of one
interface in one file. Something akin to this C++ code:
a.cpp:
class A
{
void b();
