On 23.03.2016 22:26, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 23.03.2016 22:18, cy wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 21:10:49 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
b = new int(*b + 1);
Here "b" is pointing to mutable heap allocated data, which got cast to
constant.
with b = b + 1, it's still constant memory.
It's stac
On 23.03.2016 22:18, cy wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 21:10:49 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
[...]
b = new int(*b + 1);
Here "b" is pointing to mutable heap allocated data, which got cast to
constant.
with b = b + 1, it's still constant memory.
It's stack memory. Its constness isn't any more
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 21:10:49 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Just to be 100% clear: you're adding to the pointer here,
No, that's what I meant to do.
b = new int(*b + 1);
Here "b" is pointing to mutable heap allocated data, which got
cast to constant.
with b = b + 1, it's still constant me
On 23.03.2016 21:52, cy wrote:
const(int)[2] a = [23,24];
const(int)* b = a;
Should be: const(int)* b = a.ptr;
writeln(&a," always constant");
writeln(a, " always constant");
There's some subtlety here. `a` itself is not const, but its elements
are. `a` being a fixed-sized array, you can't
