On Thursday, June 14, 2012 08:30:26 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-06-14 00:48, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> >> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> >> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
> >> is
On 2012-06-14 00:48, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected functions can be virtu
On 06/14/2012 01:57 AM, BLM768 wrote:
I guess that another solution to this whole mess is to just start
requiring the use of override; then everyone would be educated and it
would be obvious where the bug is in the code I posted. Since we don't
want to break code, though, maybe there should be a
I guess that another solution to this whole mess is to just start
requiring the use of override; then everyone would be educated
and it would be obvious where the bug is in the code I posted.
Since we don't want to break code, though, maybe there should be
a message prominently displayed on the
True, but it will be explicit in the derived class code:
No 'override', no function that is overridden.
However, if a programmer expects it to override, there could be
an issue. Imagine a novice D programmer who is not used to using
"override" and looks at at the following code:
class Bas
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:34:42 BLM768 wrote:
> > override will eventually be required when overriding a
> > function. It is already
> > if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though
> > since protected
> > isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the
> > compiler doesn
On 06/14/2012 01:34 AM, BLM768 wrote:
override will eventually be required when overriding a function. It is
already
if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though since
protected
isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the compiler doesn't
complain if you don't use ov
override will eventually be required when overriding a
function. It is already
if you compile with -w but not yet all of the time - though
since protected
isn't virtual and isn't really overriding anything, the
compiler doesn't
complain if you don't use override with it (though it will if
y
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:07:17 BLM768 wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 22:48:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> >> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> >> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal b
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 22:48:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected
On Thursday, June 14, 2012 00:32:45 BLM768 wrote:
> For some reason, whenever I declare a method with package
> visibility, it becomes non-virtual. Is this normal behavior, or
> is there a bug in DMD 2.059?
Only public and protected functions can be virtual. private and package
functions are neve
11 matches
Mail list logo
