On Monday, March 07, 2011 06:23:09 Stewart Gordon wrote:
> On 07/03/2011 02:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>
> > If you're using -cov, you probably want -unittest,
>
>
>
> I disagree:
>
> - Most of the time I use -cov, it's to check the normal flow of program
> logic, rather than the unittests
On 07/03/2011 02:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If you're using -cov, you probably want -unittest,
I disagree:
- Most of the time I use -cov, it's to check the normal flow of program logic, rather than
the unittests. It's true that it *can* be used to check that the unittests cover all
cases
On Sunday 06 March 2011 17:48:12 Stewart Gordon wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 23:19, Dan McLeran wrote:
> > never mind, i got it. i had to pass the switches:
> >
> > -D -unittest -cov
> >
> > life is hard. it's even harder when you're dumb.
>
> Would you care to enlighten the rest of us on what code yo
On 01/03/2011 23:19, Dan McLeran wrote:
never mind, i got it. i had to pass the switches:
-D -unittest -cov
life is hard. it's even harder when you're dumb.
Would you care to enlighten the rest of us on what code you were using that requires those
extra switches?
Stewart.
never mind, i got it. i had to pass the switches:
-D -unittest -cov
life is hard. it's even harder when you're dumb.
