On 7/8/20 9:38 AM, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 08.07.20 14:24, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I solved it for now by extrapolating the inner code into a local
template function. But this is definitely an awkward situation for
static foreach.
FWIW, you can write the extra function like this:
static
On 08.07.20 14:24, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I solved it for now by extrapolating the inner code into a local
template function. But this is definitely an awkward situation for
static foreach.
FWIW, you can write the extra function like this:
static foreach (T; Types)
() {
i
On 7/8/20 6:13 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 02:06:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Seems simple enough, except that this inner portion is unrolled, and
if I have more than one type to run this on, I already have an
"innerloop" label defined.
Is there a way to d
On 7/8/20 5:10 AM, cc wrote:
I think I ran into similar problems due to the requirement to use a
labeled break inside static foreach. I got around it by defining enums
when my target was found and checking if it existed via
__traits(compiles) to "ignore" the rest of the loop.
Thanks for th
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 02:06:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Seems simple enough, except that this inner portion is
unrolled, and if I have more than one type to run this on, I
already have an "innerloop" label defined.
Is there a way to define a label using a mixin or something? o
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 02:06:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OK, so I have a situation where I'm foreaching over a
compile-time list of types. Inside the loop, I'm using a second
loop over a set of input.
Inside that loop, I'm using a switch on the input, and inside
the switch, I'm
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 at 02:06:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OK, so I have a situation where I'm foreaching over a
compile-time list of types. Inside the loop, I'm using a second
loop over a set of input.
Inside that loop, I'm using a switch on the input, and inside
the switch, I'm
